The Siccness Network

Go Back   The Siccness Network > >

Open Forum »» Over a Million posts and counting!


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2018, 08:11 AM   #81
MobbinINda916
Steadily Kreepin
 
MobbinINda916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Sacramento
Posts: 7,658
Propped 4,765 Times in 1,477 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by Fucky McFuckerson View Post

No one needs an AR-15.
why not?
MobbinINda916 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following Users Gave Props To MobbinINda916:
Old 02-28-2018, 08:43 AM   #82
Fucky McFuckerson
Sicc OG
 
Fucky McFuckerson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 37,195
Propped 9,363 Times in 3,372 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by MobbinINda916 View Post
why not?
why?
Fucky McFuckerson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2018, 09:47 AM   #83
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by Fucky McFuckerson View Post
He could have just as easily scared him with a pistol or a shotgun as well.

No one needs an AR-15.
If no one needs an AR-15 then why do police agencies have and continue to purchase them?

Your tax money has gone to arm Washington State Troopers with Smith & Wesson M&P in 40 S&W. WSP, Remington 870 shotguns, AR-15 rifles and HK MP5 submachine guns. I don't know about your county and city (don't know where you live) but you have likely helped them purchase the same or similar weapons as well, and of course we all have been buying them for the feds, that according to you don't need them. Your agencies also sell the confiscated weapons to the general public, just as mine does. So, if no one needs them, why are you indirectly purchasing them for law enforcement and what have you done to stop the resale of the weapons where you live?

People talk a good game, but they don't mean it.

Last edited by StillHustlin; 02-28-2018 at 10:06 AM.
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following Users Gave Props To StillHustlin:
Old 02-28-2018, 10:52 AM   #84
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts
Anyone with common sense realizes that school zones are soft targets and these loons will continue to hit soft targets so as long as nothing is done to keep the children there safe.
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2018, 11:03 AM   #85
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following Users Gave Props To StillHustlin:
Old 02-28-2018, 12:07 PM   #86
InfamousICON
FTB
 
InfamousICON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PHX
Posts: 8,922
Propped 49,094 Times in 18,809 Posts
A high school teacher was arrested today for shooting at a window at the school he teaches at. No students were hit.

UPDATE: Teacher in custody after shot fired at Dalton HS - WRCBtv.com | Chattanooga News, Weather & Sports
InfamousICON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2018, 12:14 PM   #87
datplaya
Sicc OG
 
datplaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 412
Propped 378 Times in 211 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by InfamousICON View Post
A high school teacher was arrested today for shooting at a window at the school he teaches at. No students were hit.

UPDATE: Teacher in custody after shot fired at Dalton HS - WRCBtv.com | Chattanooga News, Weather & Sports
You cant even open a window with your gun nowadays? Why was he arrested when there were no injuries?

I'm being sarcastic here, just saying. Using guns at school (or at other pubic places) is obviously wrong
datplaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2018, 06:50 PM   #88
CognacKilla
Sicc OG
 
CognacKilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 658
Propped 523 Times in 267 Posts
I have no problem with the 2nd Amendment myself. My problem comes in when you have civilians who have access to high-powered assault weapons. In my opinion, there is no reason an untrained civilian should be able to get their hands on an AK-47, HK, SKS, etc. Those are war weapons and should only be used in combat.
CognacKilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2018, 07:16 PM   #89
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts
Isn't the intent of all guns to kill? So why does it matter if a civilian has one that you dislike vs one you are okay with? In the event some crazy has one? So it's okay for them to murder 17 people, you just not cool with 30 or 100? These arguments don't make sense to me.
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following Users Gave Props To StillHustlin:
Old 03-27-2018, 06:09 AM   #90
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts

Psychopathic Democratic Sheriff Candidate
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 06:39 AM   #91
MobbinINda916
Steadily Kreepin
 
MobbinINda916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Sacramento
Posts: 7,658
Propped 4,765 Times in 1,477 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by CognacKilla View Post
I have no problem with the 2nd Amendment myself. My problem comes in when you have civilians who have access to high-powered assault weapons. In my opinion, there is no reason an untrained civilian should be able to get their hands on an AK-47, HK, SKS, etc. Those are war weapons and should only be used in combat.
“HK” is a gun manufacturer that makes different types of firearms...why should only that particular brand be banned from citizens? LOL , that’s like saying only Smith & Wesson’s should be banned from citizens but other brands not banned.

Last edited by MobbinINda916; 03-27-2018 at 06:47 AM.
MobbinINda916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 10:13 AM   #92
CognacKilla
Sicc OG
 
CognacKilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 658
Propped 523 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by MobbinINda916 View Post
“HK” is a gun manufacturer that makes different types of firearms...why should only that particular brand be banned from citizens? LOL , that’s like saying only Smith & Wesson’s should be banned from citizens but other brands not banned.
CognacKilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 10:22 AM   #93
MobbinINda916
Steadily Kreepin
 
MobbinINda916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Sacramento
Posts: 7,658
Propped 4,765 Times in 1,477 Posts
So why should civilians not be able to get their hands on HK?, but any other name brand is exempt?
MobbinINda916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 11:32 AM   #94
CognacKilla
Sicc OG
 
CognacKilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 658
Propped 523 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by MobbinINda916;667297y 8
So why should civilians not be able to get their hands on HK?, but any other name brand is exempt?
I was referring to assault weapons. That was my fault for not looking into the topic as closely as I should have. Like StillHustlin said, the intent of all guns is to kill. I guess I have a soft spot for the innocent victims of gun violence, especially when they are women, children, the elderly and/or the differently abled. That's all I was trying to say.
CognacKilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 11:58 AM   #95
StillHustlin
FROM DUSK TIL DAWN
 
StillHustlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 33°
Posts: 6,803
Propped 6,777 Times in 3,256 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by CognacKilla View Post
I was referring to assault weapons. That was my fault for not looking into the topic as closely as I should have. Like StillHustlin said, the intent of all guns is to kill. I guess I have a soft spot for the innocent victims of gun violence, especially when they are women, children, the elderly and/or the differently abled. That's all I was trying to say.
Do you think law enforcement should be allowed to possess "assault weapons?" If so, why?
StillHustlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 12:04 PM   #96
LiterOfCola
Member
 
LiterOfCola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 81
Propped 31 Times in 16 Posts
lol differently abled that means retard huh
LiterOfCola is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following Users Gave Props To LiterOfCola:
Old 03-27-2018, 12:58 PM   #97
MobbinINda916
Steadily Kreepin
 
MobbinINda916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Sacramento
Posts: 7,658
Propped 4,765 Times in 1,477 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by CognacKilla View Post
I was referring to assault weapons.
Technically anything could be an “Assault Weapon”. If I stomped somebody’s head with my steeltoe boots then the police could charge me with assault with a deadly weapon...A kitchen knife or a hammer could be an assault weapon. Should they ban kitchen knives and hammers?

Last edited by MobbinINda916; 03-27-2018 at 01:04 PM.
MobbinINda916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 01:11 PM   #98
CognacKilla
Sicc OG
 
CognacKilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 658
Propped 523 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by StillHustlin View Post
Do you think law enforcement should be allowed to possess "assault weapons?" If so, why?
If I say "yes", then I'm labeled a "square" or a "sucka". Not that any of that matters. Or because I just so happen to listen to (gangsta) rap, among other genres, someone is bound to hop on their computer and into this thread and pull the "well aren't you a fuck the police guy" card outta their ass. It's happened before. The police have killed people with less (i.e. Eric Garner, Philando Castile, Tamir Rice, Mike Brown, etc.)
CognacKilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 01:19 PM   #99
MobbinINda916
Steadily Kreepin
 
MobbinINda916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Sacramento
Posts: 7,658
Propped 4,765 Times in 1,477 Posts
If only the cops had weapons then you wouldn’t be able to defend yourself against other people with weapons.
MobbinINda916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 01:19 PM   #100
CognacKilla
Sicc OG
 
CognacKilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 658
Propped 523 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Quote Originally Posted by LiterOfCola View Post
lol differently abled that means retard huh
Actually no. It means physically or mentally handicapped. Of course someone with your education (or lack thereof) would find calling another human being a retard humorous.
CognacKilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Amendment under attack NAMO Open Forum 32 09-29-2013 07:30 PM
Rob Stapleton on 1st Amendment [HELLA FUNNY!!] Supa SAV'D OUTT Open Forum 4 10-25-2010 10:39 PM
Were my 4th amendment rights violated? Cmoke Gathering of Minds 23 01-26-2009 04:12 AM
The Second Amendment Contagious Locc Gathering of Minds 7 08-27-2008 10:10 AM
Bye Bye Forth Amendment 2-0-Sixx Gathering of Minds 3 03-29-2004 08:56 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)
©2017 Siccness Network. All rights reserved.
Back to Top