EASTERN CONFERENCE FINALS: CELTICS VS. HEAT

heat should have "destroyed" the pacers, but ended up down 2-1 and had to claw their way out. boston has a much better functioning offense than indy

they should have destroyed a team who was the 3 seed in the East when they were missing one of their best 3 players for the whole series?

I dunno about that

being a 3 seed in the east isn't saying much, come on now. pacers have one of the ugliest offenses in the league(stats don't tell the tale, you'd have to actually watch them play) and lol at bosh being a huge deal all the sudden. they got wade and lebron, they should never have been down 2-1 against the pacers. I know the thunder and spurs wouldn't have been.

yeah, because the Thunder and Spurs are better than the Heat... I won't deny that.I'm on record stating that I think whoever comes out of the West (probably the Spurs) will win the championship

if anything I think it's impressive that Miami was able to come back from being down 2-1, win 3 in a row, and do it without Bosh. what do you mean lol @ Bosh being a big deal all of a sudden? it used to be that Lebron was a punk for teaming up with 2 all star players, now you act like Bosh doesn't even matter. lol, you spin shit any possible way to knock Lebron and the Heat. GTFOH

bosh was a big deal before they actually played together. if he was such a big deal, they wouldn't have been able to come back from 2-1 without him. bosh is an all star caliber player, but he doesn't fit in well with wade and lebron.

anyway, I was just pointing out that the heat wouldn't destroy the celtics, just like they couldn't destroy the pacers. even though they have two players in that can put up 40 a night.